More Muslim on White racist attacks in Ravensthorpe

Question: When is a racist gang not a racist gang?
Answer: When they're Asian Muslims and the victims are white....
Apparently - according to Chief Inspector Jon Carter - they're a peer group!
Whatever one of those might be.
Two white men were attacked and robbed whilst out digging for bottles in woodland off Park Road in Ravensthorpe, Dewsbury by a gang of 30 Asians. The gang who call themselves the Ravey terror squad are responsible for a number of racist attacks on white people in the past 12 months or so.
Although when the Chief Inspector of Dewsbury police was asked by the Press about the attacks he was quick to come to the defence of the thugs and described them as a peer group that's become involved in crime and anti-social behaviour.
So that's ok then. Let's hope none of his friends of family have the misfortune of coming across this 'peer group' on a dark night.
It's absolutely disgraceful the disparity between the way the Police and the media deal with racist attacks on whites as opposed to when the peprpertrator is white.
Had this been a white gang of 30 men beating up an Asian it would have been on all the local news channels, in all the local papers with the Police bending over backwards to reassure the 'Community' and promising to do all they could to catch the perpetrators.
But as usual because the victim is white and we don't go out rioting when we have a grievance it doesn't seem to matter. Of course when the BNP mention such incidents we're making it up and exploiting peoples fears. The truth is we don't need to.
Perhaps if we started blocking off roads and the like when things don't go our way then maybe the Police would start protecting us in the same way that they currently reserve for immigrants.
Read the story here.

Our Sayeeda!

Another excellent article from regular contributor JP who discusses Sayeeda Warsi's meteoric rise through the Tory party ranks, despite her only being a member of the Party for 3 years. A rise completely down to the fact that she's female and muslim. Swings and roundabouts I suppose. No wonder the local Tory councillors are sulking!

Our Sayeeda

Go on, admit it - it makes you feel proud, doesn’t it? Dead proud. Following in the footsteps of Betty Boothroyd, another Dewsbury lass has made it big in politics: Arise Baroness Warsi of Warren Street (Savile Town).

There must be summat in t’Dewsbury water – eh Sayeeda?

Crowned life peer by Dave hug-a-hoody Cameron for her services to (to what exactly)…, Baroness Warsi (sic) is now a member of the shadow cabinet with special responsibility for community cohesion. If anyone can mend our broken society Baroness Warsi can.

However it was a shame that Sayeeda opted for the tradesman’s entrance rather than putting herself to the test via a general election. But no doubt she’s still smarting from the hiding she got last time care of Shahid (the martyr) Malik, Dewsbury’s discredited Labour MP. Then again if you can march straight into office without bothering to go through the electoral process just because you know people in high places… networking comes naturally to Sayeeda. Well naturally!

Baroness Warsi explained her reluctance to take on Malik at the next election thus, “There are people out there (i.e. Dewsbury Tory voters) who could not handle two ethnic minority candidates.” Our Sayeeda is “fiercely proud of her home town” (i.e. Dewsbury) and she felt that two ethnic minority candidates “…would lead to an increase in the Dewsbury vote, and I don’t want that for Dewsbury.” Selfless to the end, that’s Sayeeda.
But I get the feeling the baroness isn’t being straight with us. Although she implies that she made the decision not to stand, the reality is that local Tories told her that they’d stand a greater chance of winning the Dewsbury constituency if their candidate was white! Their argument was that “…Dewsbury and Mirfield voters did not want two ethnic minority candidates pitched against each other so soon after the bitter campaign of 2005.”

Presumably Sayeeda felt adequately compensated by Dave’s offer of a life peerage. So much for principle!

Interesting isn’t it that Sayeeda should go along with what is after all a ‘racist analysis’ for it suggests that white voters vote according to the race of the candidate. Yet our Sayeeda makes great play of her forthrightness. True to her Yorkshire roots (sic) she likes to call a spade a spade or a shovel even, and she ‘…says what she thinks even if it conflicts with policy.’ Sayeeda pulls no punches, “It is about time people were open and honest about what is going on,” she says. One wonders why then she’s not ‘open and honest about what’s going on’ – oh yes I forgot, that life peerage…

The Baroness is “…bursting with ideas on how to bring together communities,” but curiously she doesn’t tell us what those ideas are. My guess is she’s planning coffee and (halal) cakes mornings at the Markazi mosque in Savile Town.

But exactly what sort of a Conservative is Sayeeda? What exactly is it that she wants to conserve?

”Sayeeda has always been politically involved from her early college days when she was elected as the Vice President of the Student Union. She was
also instrumental in the launch of Operation Black Vote in West Yorkshire in 1996.
She has always had a keen interest in racial justice issues. For many years she
was an executive member of the Kirklees Racial Equality Council. She is also a
member of the extreme left wing Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust's Racial Justice Committee and regularly represents them at national conferences.
Sayeeda was born in Dewsbury in 1971 and was educated at Birkdale High School
and Dewsbury College, and then the University of Leeds where she read Law (LLB).
She attended the York College of Law to complete her Legal Practice Course and
trained both with the Crown Prosecution Service and the Home Office Immigration Department. Prior to her elevation to the Lords she was an immigration lawyer helping her fellow immigrants to secure their 'rightful' presence in our country.”

And according to an article she penned for the Asian newspaper Awaaz, Sayeeda argued that the tightening of anti-terrorist legislation has turned Britain into a ‘police state’. She went on to say that the anti-terror proposals were, “…enough to tip any normal young man into the reals of a radicalised fanatic.” It’s not their fault that they want to murder ordinary British people in their pursuit of a world-wide Islamic state, it’s our fault for opposing them.

Some Tory eh?

Read about 'our' Sayeeda here

Markazi mosque

Interesting Editors comment in this weeks Press newspaper which refers to Monday's story in the Times newspaper which investigated a Muslim group that has its headquarters at the Markazi mosque in Savile Town in Dewsbury.
The group's ultimate aim- according to a 'shocked' Times reporter - is to convert the country and ultimately the world to Islam - not exactly a revelation bearing in mind that spreading the word of Islam , by force if necessary is what required of all 'good' Muslims and is sanctioned by Allah in black and white in their Holy book - The Koran.
No wonder Shahid Malik is so keen to try to shut the Press newspaper down which leads us to our next story regarding the front page lead which refers to Malik's decision to sue the Press newspaper because they printed a letter from Jonathan Scott the then prospective Conservative candidate for Dewsbury South who claimed in the letter to have been racially threatened by Malik's entourage outside a polling station.
Despite the letter appearing in the Labour supporting, arse licking Dewsbury Reporter as well as the Press Newspaper strangely enough only the Press are being sued in court.
Unfortunately for Malik even if he does manage to win this court case - which would be no surprise bearing in mind the political sympathies of most Judges - it can do him nothing but harm and will show his true colours and petty mindedness to those who voted for him the first time around.
Read the Editors comment here. (Scroll Down)
Read the story about Malik here

Battlefield Tours

As I touched on last night, we at Kirklees Resistance have just returned from a tour of the First World War battlefields, graves and memorials on the Western Front of France and Belgium. It’s something that several companies do and is something that we would highly recommend to anyone interested and would especially recommend it to the idiots of the Labour Party and such extreme left groups as Kirklees Unity who have no concept of what it means to be British and are determined to destroy the native British people and culture by whatever means possible.

Anyway it’s a fascinating and in places moving experience especially when you hear of the many instances of personal sacrifice. It also invokes a sense of anger when you realise that a lot of the death could have been avoided had it not been for the fact that the men were led basically by stubborn, public school educated idiots who weren’t officers because of any tactical expertise but because of the fact that were of the right breeding.

I wonder how many of the British soldiers who served in the First World would need New Labour lessons in what it means to be British? The answer of course is none; they knew exactly what it meant and a lot of them paid the ultimate sacrifice.
Anyone thinking of going who maybe wants to pay their respects to a relative as we did can go on the Commonwealth War Graves Commission site fill in the details of the relative and they will tell them the exact graveyard or memorial and plot where their relative is buried or commemorated.
Click here to go to the site

New postings soon

We've not posted a any stories for a few day as we've been away for a few days here at Kirklees Resistance HQ, visiting the First World War battlefields of the Western Front and paying our respects to those who gave so much, but we will be reporting on our experiences and bringing some new stories tomorrow.

Doubt the 'incident below actually happened as the bloke involved would be doing a stretch at her Maj's pleasure and the Muslim involved would be trousering a 6 figure sum for hurt feelings but interesting nonetheless


An incident occurred in a supermarket recently, when the following was
witnessed:

A Muslim woman dressed in a burkha (A black gown & face mask) was
standing with her shopping in a queue at the checkout. When it was her
turn to be served, and as she reached the cashier, she made a loud
remark about the British Flag lapel pin, which the female cashier was
wearing on her blouse. The cashier reached up and touched the pin and
said, "Yes, I always wear it proudly. My son serves abroad with the
forces and I wear it for him".

The Muslim woman then asked the cashier when she was going to stop
bombing and killing her countrymen, explaining that she was Iraqi. At
that point, a Gentleman standing in the queue stepped forward, and interrupted with a calm and gentle voice, and said to the Iraqi woman:

"Excuse me, but hundreds of thousands of men and women, just like this
ladies son have fought and sacrificed their lives so that people just
like YOU can stand here, in England, which is MY country and allow you
to blatantly accuse an innocent check-out cashier of bombing YOUR
countrymen". "It is my belief that if you were allowed to be as
outspoken as that in Iraq which you claim to be YOUR country, then we
wouldn't need to be fighting there today". "However - now that you have
learned how to speak out and criticize the English people who have
afforded you the protection of MY country, I will gladly pay the cost of
a ticket to help you pay your way back to Iraq". "When you get there,
and if you manage to survive for being as outspoken as what you are here
in England, then you should be able to help straighten out the mess
which YOUR Iraqi countrymen have got you into in the first place, which
appears to be the reason that you have come to MY country to avoid."

Apparently the queue cheered and applauded.

IF YOU AGREE... Pass this on to all of your proud British friends.
I just did...!!!

Reporter Comment

We receive many comments here at Kirklees Resistance HQ. Mostly positive, some negative but unlike the blogs who claim to 'fight fascism' we are (like the BNP) democratic and invite comment from all sides of the political spectrum providing comments aren't abusive which rules out the anti's as abuse is all they have. Anyway I digress. Like i say we receive all manner of comments some good and some not so good but the one below was such a well written and insightful would it seemed wasted in the comments section so i thought i print it in the main section. Thanks to never surrender for sending it. Cheers


The problem with the Dewsbury Reporter/Batley News group is that they are run by self-serving people at the top, who seek to undermine genuine journalistic facts to promote their own political agenda.

I remember reading the 'unbiased' Dewsbury Reporter, 1 or 2 weeks before the 2007 local elections. What struck me was the Reporter has a weekly column that the newspaper invites people to be a columnist for a weekly edition.

This particular column, titled the 'last word'. In the last word, one week it contained drivel from the notorious Carl 'Muppett' sorry Morphett.

It certainly was the last word. Morphett and the Reporter made sure of it. They guaranteed that Morphett spouted the same multi-cultural clap-trap that you read in obnoxious, national newspapers like the Daily Mirror and the Guardian.

Shamefully, not one weekly edition of the Reporter had a column that printed views from BNP councillors Auty, Exley, Roberts or even prospective candidates for the BNP to be included in the last word, leading up to the elections.

Were the Reporter found guilty of denying their readers fair, political balance?

Yes, they were found guilty, and should have been sentenced for the crime of unfair, but biased political reporting that was to sabotage the integrity of the BNP.

Reporter readers had ONLY one version to read from the last word column, which was to read anti BNP, pro New Labour, multi-cultural tosh.

This ghastly specimen in Morphett, actively campaigns on a full-time basis against the BNP. Morphett is part of the bullying, thuggish fringe of the New Labour party.

The same party that issued BNP leader Nick Griffin to stand up in court, and defend himself for simply mouthing the words 'wicked and vicious' in a realistic observation on the medieval Islam that threatens civilisation in Britain.

The mentality of Morphett is to portray himself to be a champion of democracy, and to highlight woefully that the BNP have no solutions in Britain of today.

Morphett highlights that he champions fascism, because he campaigns against a legal, political party in the BNP.

I've got one word for Morphett, and that shall be: HYPOCRITE!!!

The West in the 21st Century — Developed or Developing Nations?

Another excellent thought provoking piece by the Norwegian blogger Fjordman. Well worth a read.

The West in the 21st Century — Developed or Developing Nations?
Fjordman -
In the debate regarding how the relationship between the Old West, Europe, and the New West, the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, will be in the 21st century, many observers seem to take for granted that much of Europe will fall to Islam, and that native Europeans will flee and resettle in the New West. There is, however, another scenario that is theoretically possible, but little discussed. What if the opposite happens? There are Europeans emigrating/fleeing to these nations already now, but I think they will discover once there that the problems they are fleeing from are already present in their new homelands. Some of them are even worse there, especially since many of those fleeing will be white, and they will discover that whites are rapidly diminishing as a factor in these countries and that hostility towards whites is rising.

I gave serious thought to emigrating to the USA or some other English-speaking country a couple of years ago. I don’t blame Europeans who do so, but for me personally, this seems like a less attractive proposition now than it was then. First of all because I believe there is still work to be done in Europe, and second of all because so far I can’t see that the countries of the New West are standing up to Muslims in a forceful way, either, with the possible exception of Australia. And finally, because I’m white, and the more I read about the situation in the USA, Canada and New Zealand the less I feel like moving there. Frankly, I’m not sure whether I see any future in being white in the USA. Maybe there is no point in moving from the Old West to the New West because most of our problems are shared for all Western nations. Indeed one could claim that the West is now recognized not so much by a shared civilizational legacy as by shared problems.
- - - - - - - - - -
We are definitely witnessing the end of the Western world order, as I’ve said before. That doesn’t necessarily mean the end of the West itself, although some pessimists do believe this, too. According to the blogger Conservative Swede, people of European origins will become the global Jews of the 21st century, moving around to whatever country will take them in, while Germany, Italy and Britain will be populated by Nigerians and Kurds:

So what’s the future for people like me? Because even if I belong nowhere politically, I belong somewhere socially and ethnically. Well, the world is being homogenized. Tomorrow the whole world will be like the Third World. People like me, of European ethnicity, will have no home, no nation. We will live like the Jews as elites in other people’s nations (preferably a non-Muslim nation). This doesn’t scare me. The Jews have lived thusly for two thousand years. It’s a pity, but this is our destiny. This is what the Western Christians and liberals are working eagerly towards. This is what they are programmed to do. This is what they will achieve. I’ll let them have it. As an individual I cannot change this. The only thing I can do is to prepare myself for it. A good plan is to live as a ‘Jew’ in Catholic/Mestizo Latin America rather than a Muslim Europe, or the sinking Titanic of America. Even China looks like an option, in comparison.

There is some basis for claiming this, unfortunately. Our left-wing intellectuals love developing countries so much that they want us to become developing countries, too, a new form of rehashed global Communism. I recently read a column in Al-Guardian by Timothy Garton Ash, who also loves the European Union, hailing Brazil as the model for the future, where we are all merged into just one race, the human race. Multinational corporations want to erase borders to create one big world of capital, goods and consumers, and I’m pretty sure some members of our political elites are envious of the corrupt plutocrats ruling many Third Word nations.

Still, I think it’s a tad too pessimistic to resign to the inevitability of this scenario. Some countries will resist, perhaps successfully, and I’m not necessarily sure the English-speaking countries will come out on top. It has become custom in segments of the English-speaking blogosphere to bash the countries of continental Europe. Some of this is justified. France has led the creation of the EU, Eurabia and the European appeasement of Arabs, and they deserved to be bashed for it. However, if you look closely at the ideology of Multiculturalism, as I have done for some time now, you will notice that it wasn’t spread by France, where the ideal was never Multiculturalism but the assimilation of all groups equally into the secular French Republic. Not that that alternative worked out too well, either.

On the contrary, some writers such as Paul Gottfried have convincingly argued that Multiculturalism and identity politics, which are now eating away at the body of what once was Western civilization, were spread from the English-speaking countries, especially from the United States. This makes sense once you notice that the much-vaunted Anglosphere in fact leads the West in self-destruction. Canada is a Multicultural basket case, as is New Zealand. Britain, in particular England, the cradle of the Anglosphere, is one of the worst — some say the worst — countries in Western Europe, which leaves Australia and segments within the USA resisting their demise. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Canada and New Zealand cease being recognizably Western within this century, and the USA being divided into several countries, including perhaps one predominantly white nation incorporating parts of Canada. Australia could stand a better chance of pulling through, but we should remember that it is a demographically vulnerable nation that is geographically merely an extension of Asia.

I’m not sure whether most of Europe, even all of Western Europe, will fall to Islam in the end. Worst case scenario: Muslims will create several smaller Pakistans or Kosovos, for instance one stretching from parts of France via Belgium to the Netherlands, one in regions of England and another one in southern Sweden. The situation in France and England is difficult to predict. France does seem set to become a Muslim country by now, but it is also a nation with an unpredictable revolutionary legacy. England sometimes appears lost, but my gut feeling tells me that there is still some residue left of the old warrior spirit there, which means that they will put up a fight at some point. France and Britain now both face the choice between becoming Islamic or engage in devastating civil wars. This could, ironically, lead to the rise of Germany as the pre-eminent European power. The Germans have significant problems with immigration, too, as do pretty much all Western countries these days, but they are nowhere near as bad as those of the French and the British.

If the Anglosphere implodes in this century due to the Multicultural ideology that it has been promoting and championing, this leaves the possibility that some people of European origins in the New West will flee back to the newly liberated nations of Free Europe. On the global scale, the Sino-American rivalry predicted by many now could fail to materialize. Not necessarily because China won’t be strong enough to rival the US, but because the US — or whatever remains of the US at that point — won’t be strong enough to rival China.

Finally, one comment from Mikhail Paul:

I have a mix of extreme pessimism and cautious optimism about the West. North America and England are already gone, as is New Zealand and pockets of Scandinavia— well in the process of demographic race replacement that’s irreversible at this point. But part of Europe is holding its own, especially the German lands, Finland, Denmark and Iceland, and (to my surprise) France, Spain, Portugal and Italy also coming through this. Belgium and the Netherlands could go either way, but seem now to be inclining more toward the self-preservationist tendencies of Finland and Germany rather than the PC self-destruction plan of North America and England. An independent Scotland and Wales may also join in, as will Ireland— Celtic languages like Irish Gaelic, Welsh and Scottish Gaelic, all but moribund today, will likely rebound, as these will be all that’s left of Britain as a Western nation. We do live in interesting times to say the very least.

We certainly do. Whatever the end result will be of this process, with Iraqis moving to Sweden and Swedes to Latin America, Chinese moving to Britain and Britons to Australia, Turks moving to Germany and Germans to the Unites States it is bound to be unsettling for a long time to come. Maybe I should move somewhere quiet to watch the whole mess from a distance, somewhere the masses won’t follow. What about Antarctica? Fjordman is a noted Norwegian blogger who has written for many conservative web sites. He used to have his own Fjordman Blog in the past, but it is no longer active.

The Forgotten Holocaust

"This crime was planned and executed for political reasons. The opportunity presented itself for clearing Turkish soil of a Christian race." - Winston Churchill

In 1915 as the first world war raged in Europe the Ottoman Turks seized the opportunity that the turmoil of war gave them and set out to eradicate the Armenian people from 'their' land.
One and a half million Armenians were tortured and eventually murdered in an orchestrated genocide the details of which are almost too sickening to think about. Their crime? Being Christian in a Muslim land.
Even to this day the Turks won't acknowledge the genocide.
A warning for all of us in Europe.
Wake up vote BNP
Read the full story here