Markazi mosque

Interesting Editors comment in this weeks Press newspaper which refers to Monday's story in the Times newspaper which investigated a Muslim group that has its headquarters at the Markazi mosque in Savile Town in Dewsbury.
The group's ultimate aim- according to a 'shocked' Times reporter - is to convert the country and ultimately the world to Islam - not exactly a revelation bearing in mind that spreading the word of Islam , by force if necessary is what required of all 'good' Muslims and is sanctioned by Allah in black and white in their Holy book - The Koran.
No wonder Shahid Malik is so keen to try to shut the Press newspaper down which leads us to our next story regarding the front page lead which refers to Malik's decision to sue the Press newspaper because they printed a letter from Jonathan Scott the then prospective Conservative candidate for Dewsbury South who claimed in the letter to have been racially threatened by Malik's entourage outside a polling station.
Despite the letter appearing in the Labour supporting, arse licking Dewsbury Reporter as well as the Press Newspaper strangely enough only the Press are being sued in court.
Unfortunately for Malik even if he does manage to win this court case - which would be no surprise bearing in mind the political sympathies of most Judges - it can do him nothing but harm and will show his true colours and petty mindedness to those who voted for him the first time around.
Read the Editors comment here. (Scroll Down)
Read the story about Malik here

Doubt the 'incident below actually happened as the bloke involved would be doing a stretch at her Maj's pleasure and the Muslim involved would be trousering a 6 figure sum for hurt feelings but interesting nonetheless


An incident occurred in a supermarket recently, when the following was
witnessed:

A Muslim woman dressed in a burkha (A black gown & face mask) was
standing with her shopping in a queue at the checkout. When it was her
turn to be served, and as she reached the cashier, she made a loud
remark about the British Flag lapel pin, which the female cashier was
wearing on her blouse. The cashier reached up and touched the pin and
said, "Yes, I always wear it proudly. My son serves abroad with the
forces and I wear it for him".

The Muslim woman then asked the cashier when she was going to stop
bombing and killing her countrymen, explaining that she was Iraqi. At
that point, a Gentleman standing in the queue stepped forward, and interrupted with a calm and gentle voice, and said to the Iraqi woman:

"Excuse me, but hundreds of thousands of men and women, just like this
ladies son have fought and sacrificed their lives so that people just
like YOU can stand here, in England, which is MY country and allow you
to blatantly accuse an innocent check-out cashier of bombing YOUR
countrymen". "It is my belief that if you were allowed to be as
outspoken as that in Iraq which you claim to be YOUR country, then we
wouldn't need to be fighting there today". "However - now that you have
learned how to speak out and criticize the English people who have
afforded you the protection of MY country, I will gladly pay the cost of
a ticket to help you pay your way back to Iraq". "When you get there,
and if you manage to survive for being as outspoken as what you are here
in England, then you should be able to help straighten out the mess
which YOUR Iraqi countrymen have got you into in the first place, which
appears to be the reason that you have come to MY country to avoid."

Apparently the queue cheered and applauded.

IF YOU AGREE... Pass this on to all of your proud British friends.
I just did...!!!

The West in the 21st Century — Developed or Developing Nations?

Another excellent thought provoking piece by the Norwegian blogger Fjordman. Well worth a read.

The West in the 21st Century — Developed or Developing Nations?
Fjordman -
In the debate regarding how the relationship between the Old West, Europe, and the New West, the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, will be in the 21st century, many observers seem to take for granted that much of Europe will fall to Islam, and that native Europeans will flee and resettle in the New West. There is, however, another scenario that is theoretically possible, but little discussed. What if the opposite happens? There are Europeans emigrating/fleeing to these nations already now, but I think they will discover once there that the problems they are fleeing from are already present in their new homelands. Some of them are even worse there, especially since many of those fleeing will be white, and they will discover that whites are rapidly diminishing as a factor in these countries and that hostility towards whites is rising.

I gave serious thought to emigrating to the USA or some other English-speaking country a couple of years ago. I don’t blame Europeans who do so, but for me personally, this seems like a less attractive proposition now than it was then. First of all because I believe there is still work to be done in Europe, and second of all because so far I can’t see that the countries of the New West are standing up to Muslims in a forceful way, either, with the possible exception of Australia. And finally, because I’m white, and the more I read about the situation in the USA, Canada and New Zealand the less I feel like moving there. Frankly, I’m not sure whether I see any future in being white in the USA. Maybe there is no point in moving from the Old West to the New West because most of our problems are shared for all Western nations. Indeed one could claim that the West is now recognized not so much by a shared civilizational legacy as by shared problems.
- - - - - - - - - -
We are definitely witnessing the end of the Western world order, as I’ve said before. That doesn’t necessarily mean the end of the West itself, although some pessimists do believe this, too. According to the blogger Conservative Swede, people of European origins will become the global Jews of the 21st century, moving around to whatever country will take them in, while Germany, Italy and Britain will be populated by Nigerians and Kurds:

So what’s the future for people like me? Because even if I belong nowhere politically, I belong somewhere socially and ethnically. Well, the world is being homogenized. Tomorrow the whole world will be like the Third World. People like me, of European ethnicity, will have no home, no nation. We will live like the Jews as elites in other people’s nations (preferably a non-Muslim nation). This doesn’t scare me. The Jews have lived thusly for two thousand years. It’s a pity, but this is our destiny. This is what the Western Christians and liberals are working eagerly towards. This is what they are programmed to do. This is what they will achieve. I’ll let them have it. As an individual I cannot change this. The only thing I can do is to prepare myself for it. A good plan is to live as a ‘Jew’ in Catholic/Mestizo Latin America rather than a Muslim Europe, or the sinking Titanic of America. Even China looks like an option, in comparison.

There is some basis for claiming this, unfortunately. Our left-wing intellectuals love developing countries so much that they want us to become developing countries, too, a new form of rehashed global Communism. I recently read a column in Al-Guardian by Timothy Garton Ash, who also loves the European Union, hailing Brazil as the model for the future, where we are all merged into just one race, the human race. Multinational corporations want to erase borders to create one big world of capital, goods and consumers, and I’m pretty sure some members of our political elites are envious of the corrupt plutocrats ruling many Third Word nations.

Still, I think it’s a tad too pessimistic to resign to the inevitability of this scenario. Some countries will resist, perhaps successfully, and I’m not necessarily sure the English-speaking countries will come out on top. It has become custom in segments of the English-speaking blogosphere to bash the countries of continental Europe. Some of this is justified. France has led the creation of the EU, Eurabia and the European appeasement of Arabs, and they deserved to be bashed for it. However, if you look closely at the ideology of Multiculturalism, as I have done for some time now, you will notice that it wasn’t spread by France, where the ideal was never Multiculturalism but the assimilation of all groups equally into the secular French Republic. Not that that alternative worked out too well, either.

On the contrary, some writers such as Paul Gottfried have convincingly argued that Multiculturalism and identity politics, which are now eating away at the body of what once was Western civilization, were spread from the English-speaking countries, especially from the United States. This makes sense once you notice that the much-vaunted Anglosphere in fact leads the West in self-destruction. Canada is a Multicultural basket case, as is New Zealand. Britain, in particular England, the cradle of the Anglosphere, is one of the worst — some say the worst — countries in Western Europe, which leaves Australia and segments within the USA resisting their demise. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Canada and New Zealand cease being recognizably Western within this century, and the USA being divided into several countries, including perhaps one predominantly white nation incorporating parts of Canada. Australia could stand a better chance of pulling through, but we should remember that it is a demographically vulnerable nation that is geographically merely an extension of Asia.

I’m not sure whether most of Europe, even all of Western Europe, will fall to Islam in the end. Worst case scenario: Muslims will create several smaller Pakistans or Kosovos, for instance one stretching from parts of France via Belgium to the Netherlands, one in regions of England and another one in southern Sweden. The situation in France and England is difficult to predict. France does seem set to become a Muslim country by now, but it is also a nation with an unpredictable revolutionary legacy. England sometimes appears lost, but my gut feeling tells me that there is still some residue left of the old warrior spirit there, which means that they will put up a fight at some point. France and Britain now both face the choice between becoming Islamic or engage in devastating civil wars. This could, ironically, lead to the rise of Germany as the pre-eminent European power. The Germans have significant problems with immigration, too, as do pretty much all Western countries these days, but they are nowhere near as bad as those of the French and the British.

If the Anglosphere implodes in this century due to the Multicultural ideology that it has been promoting and championing, this leaves the possibility that some people of European origins in the New West will flee back to the newly liberated nations of Free Europe. On the global scale, the Sino-American rivalry predicted by many now could fail to materialize. Not necessarily because China won’t be strong enough to rival the US, but because the US — or whatever remains of the US at that point — won’t be strong enough to rival China.

Finally, one comment from Mikhail Paul:

I have a mix of extreme pessimism and cautious optimism about the West. North America and England are already gone, as is New Zealand and pockets of Scandinavia— well in the process of demographic race replacement that’s irreversible at this point. But part of Europe is holding its own, especially the German lands, Finland, Denmark and Iceland, and (to my surprise) France, Spain, Portugal and Italy also coming through this. Belgium and the Netherlands could go either way, but seem now to be inclining more toward the self-preservationist tendencies of Finland and Germany rather than the PC self-destruction plan of North America and England. An independent Scotland and Wales may also join in, as will Ireland— Celtic languages like Irish Gaelic, Welsh and Scottish Gaelic, all but moribund today, will likely rebound, as these will be all that’s left of Britain as a Western nation. We do live in interesting times to say the very least.

We certainly do. Whatever the end result will be of this process, with Iraqis moving to Sweden and Swedes to Latin America, Chinese moving to Britain and Britons to Australia, Turks moving to Germany and Germans to the Unites States it is bound to be unsettling for a long time to come. Maybe I should move somewhere quiet to watch the whole mess from a distance, somewhere the masses won’t follow. What about Antarctica? Fjordman is a noted Norwegian blogger who has written for many conservative web sites. He used to have his own Fjordman Blog in the past, but it is no longer active.

The Forgotten Holocaust

"This crime was planned and executed for political reasons. The opportunity presented itself for clearing Turkish soil of a Christian race." - Winston Churchill

In 1915 as the first world war raged in Europe the Ottoman Turks seized the opportunity that the turmoil of war gave them and set out to eradicate the Armenian people from 'their' land.
One and a half million Armenians were tortured and eventually murdered in an orchestrated genocide the details of which are almost too sickening to think about. Their crime? Being Christian in a Muslim land.
Even to this day the Turks won't acknowledge the genocide.
A warning for all of us in Europe.
Wake up vote BNP
Read the full story here

November Bank Holiday?

Apparently Labour 'insiders' are considering another Bank holiday intended for November on the Monday after Remembrance Sunday to honour community 'heroes'.
Kath Stanley of the 'Public Policy Research' a Marxist think tank which advises the Government says:
'We need a day when people give something back to their communities and celebrate the diversity and pluralism of modern Britain'.
In other words a day off to allow them to ram 'multi culturalism' and 'diversity' and other unwelcome additions and dilutions of our once great nation down our throats.
You can imagine the BBC TV programming schedule for the day.
It'd be all about what terrible, nasty people whites are and would be dominated by programs about slavery, how black crime and failure is white people's fault, Steven Lawrence, how we're all wrong about Islam and how it's such a cuddly, touchy feely type religion that would be favoured by kittens. Then they'd wheel on the obligatory white apologist such as Ken Livingstone, blubbing for white people's sins and begging some black such as Jessie Jackson (who used to spit in white people hamburgers when he worked in a fast food take away) for forgiveness.
You get the picture, the BBC execs would be orgasmic at the very thought of it.

Well no thank you, you can stick your bank holiday where the sun doesn't shine (and it never does especially in November). We and millions of other fellow Brits don't need a bank holiday to remind us what it means to be British, we live and breath it every day. It's New Labour traitors who appear to have forgot or rather are trying to forget what it means to be British by doing their utmost to turn our once great nation into a third world slum, such is their contempt for us and all things British.
And why put it on the day after Remembrance Sunday? Is it some attempt to overshadow the sacrifices given by British soldiers around the globe?
What do you think?
Obviously remembering the nations war dead who died so that the likes of New Labour would have the freedoms they so abuse today, is far too hideously white for their sensibilities so they attempt to sweep it under the carpet with the rest of Britain's history that they seem to be so ashamed of.
Another Bank Holiday would be nice but not to celebrate something that the British people never asked for and never wanted. No way.
Read the story here.

Best market in the land?

In a follow up to the story regarding Marks and Spencer and it’s decision to pull out of Dewsbury after a hundred years of trading.

Anyone who lives in or has had the dubious pleasure of visiting Dewsbury will know that the town centre is an awful, dirty, threatening place and that the market in particular resembles a third world bartering den that basically sells tat, so it came as quite a shock when it was voted ‘best outdoor market in the country’ a decision that probably owes more to it ticking the right boxes with regard to racial 'make up' and 'diversity' in today’s increasingly politically correct, totalitarian climate - rather than it having anyting to do with such petty considerations as selling anything useful or any traditionally British produce and goods that British markets were once famous for.
Anyway it would appear I’m not the only one to have such heretical thoughts and opinions as these three letters from the local newspaper the Press show.

The following letter was originally printed in last weeks edition of the Press the other two were in this weeks.

From: Wendy Senior, Dewsbury

Dear Sir,

This is the last straw! The only decent store we have leaving Dewsbury after almost 100 years trading there.
Kirklees Council are at fault for this. Look at the shops gone from Dewsbury: Co-op, Bickers, Hudsons and Strawberry Fair. Also five cinemas and a theatre – the lovely Empire.
Then there was our hospital, paid for by Dewsbury businessmen, pulled down and houses built on the land.
Look at Huddersfield; compare it with Dewsbury. Where is our Council Tax going?
Dewsbury was such a lovely town; now we have a market resembling Bangladesh, women in burkhas and men in pyjamas. Ravensthorpe and Savile Town have problems with Iraqis and Pakistanis. Who is putting them there?
Dewsbury Hospital is being down-graded by Pontefract and Pinderfields Hospitals taking money intended for Dewsbury.
Why do Dewsbury people have to pay exorbitant parking charges when Batley, Mirfield and Heckmondwike car parks are free?
So, what do we do about this... nothing?
Or do we make a fuss. I will be outside Marks & Spencer on Wednesday August 22 from 11am collecting signatures to save our store.
Also, a petition to leave Kirklees and return to our own council. This is the only way to save Dewsbury.
Any offers of help will be welcome.


From: Mr RL Rowbottom, Dewsbury

Dear Sir,

I agree entirely with the views of Wendy Senior describing the state of Dewsbury and the description of Dewsbury market resembling Bangladesh.

I cannot think of any town within a 30-mile radius offering as little as Dewsbury does and I do not blame Marks & Spencer for leaving a sinking ship. I can’t imagine any reputable business ever wanting to move to Dewsbury.

I cannot understand how the market was voted ‘best outdoor market in the country’ compared to those such as Barnsley which is a far more traditional English market. I also can’t believe anyone who visits by coach trip will ever want to come again.

Regarding the burkha, can anyone explain why they are more prominent in the town centre and Savile Town as opposed to Ravensthorpe?

On a recent holiday in Tunisia – it has a with a 95 per cent plus Muslim population – the occupants of the nearby city were dressed more Westernised than you see in Dewsbury, and there was not one burkha in sight.

I do not think I would last long if I wore a white hood with just my eyes visible.

I am now retired and was born and bred in Dewsbury and have enjoyed many good times before the bad publicity arrived, and, I am sorry to say, that I now find this town the absolute pits.

From: Name and address supplied

Dear Sir,

Why the big fuss about Marks & Spencer quitting Dewsbury? It’s not that much of a shock, is it?

They’re only doing what a growing number of Dewsbury’s original inhabitants are contemplating. I’ve lived the majority of my life within four or five miles of Dewsbury town centre but it’s somewhere I avoid these days.

In fact the last time I visited was at Christmas to do a bit of last minute shopping, and I vowed at the time that I’d not visit the place again. I had the kids with me and they’ve not been since either.

My wife hasn’t been to the market for years and on the rare occasions she does go to Dewsbury she restricts herself to Sainsbury’s. Our experience is that we feel alienated in our own town. We feel we don’t belong any more.

Dewsbury is in the process of becoming a foreign country and, like Marks & Spencer, our intention is to quit the area as soon as we can.

According to council leader Robert Light, £80 million has been ‘invested’ in Dewsbury, and that may be so, but it’s still a tatty, alienating place and my guess is it will only get worse

Anti-Islamist Rally Banned in Brussels

By Vasko Kohlmayer
FrontPageMagazine.com
An eagerly awaited public rally was to take place in Brussels – the capital of the European Union – on September 11 of this year. Called ‘Against Islamisation of Europe,’ its intent was to protest the spreading of Islamic sharia law across the European continent and honour by a minute of silence the victims of the 9/11 terror attacks.

The event was being organized by SIOE (Stop the Islamisation of Europe), an alliance of people from across Europe whose objective is to prevent Islam from ‘becoming a dominant political force in Europe.’ Concerned about the Muslim subversion of the continent’s cultures and institutions, SIOE’s has this to say about Islam:

No other religion demands more from those who do not adhere to its doctrine. This would not be a problem if our leaders actually stood up for Western values and insisted that Muslims live within our laws and accepted our cultures and social systems. Instead, it is we who are told we must abandon our values, cultures and societies in order not to offend Muslims. It is Islam that is being rammed down our throats and the throats of our children. It is not only in the West that Islam is causing misery and mayhem. All around the world Islam is battling the “infidels”.

In a clear sign of public support for the planned demonstration, 20,000 people from across Europe have pledged their participation.

But now it looks the event will not be allowed to proceed. On August 13, Brussels’ Mayor Freddy Thielemans, a socialist, made the decision not to issue a permit for the march.

The Mayor’s decision is a very unusual one, because Brussels is known as a demonstration friendly city. In fact, it is the demonstration capital of the world with two or three events taking place on average every day. In the last six years alone, the Mayor’s office has received 3,600 requests for public protest permits of which only 6 have been denied.

But the Mayor is trying to do more than just stop people from voicing their concerns about the ongoing Islamization of their culture. This is what he wrote on August 20 in an op-ed piece in the Belgian newspaper De Standaard:

First and foremost the organizers have chosen the symbolic date of 9/11. The intention is obviously to confound the terrorist activities of Muslim extremists on the one hand and Islam as a religion and all Muslims on the other hand. […] Such incitement to discrimination and hatred, which we usually call racism and xenophobia, is forbidden by a considerable number of international treaties and is punished by our penal laws and by European legislation. The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly pronounced judgments condemning this type of acts.

In what is a truly surreal development, a European public official calls those concerned about the encroachment of Islam on their life extremists and threatens criminal prosecution if they don’t desist.

The Mayor’s concern about extremism is very selective, however. In December of 2004, for example, he allowed a demonstration to proceed where more than 20,000 Iranians protested against the inclusion of People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran in EU's list of terrorist organizations. This is how this group was once described by the US Department of State:

The Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), a leftist revolutionary group, was formed in 1963. Its founding principles included the creation of a Marxist-oriented Islamic government in Iran; opposition to 'imperialism' as supposedly embodied by the United States; opposition to Zionism and Israel; and a close affinity to Third World radical movements. […] To achieve its political objectives, the MEK almost from its inception has engaged in acts of terrorism and violence; the organization was responsible for fatal attacks on several Americans in Iran in the 1970s.

Not only was the demonstration allowed to go on – it took place in front of the EU’s headquarters – it received extensive official backing. Numerous speeches were made by European parliamentarians and various public personalities seeking to remove the group’s terror designation.

This makes for a remarkable situation: In the EU capital, Iranian Muslims are allowed to show their solidarity with a questionable organization while native citizens are being turned into criminals for seeking to voice their concerns about the unfolding Islamic takeover of their lands.

To add insult to injury, on the very day the organizers of the 9/11 rally were protesting the decision to block the event, Mayor Thielemans approved a permit for another demonstration to take place on September 9. Organized by an alliance of ‘various truth, peace and human right movements in Europe’ calling themselves United for Truth, they claim that the 9/11 attacks were staged by the Bush administration with possible support from some European governments. A message posted on their website on July 30 reads in part:

Recently the French Minister for Housing and the City Mme Christine Boutin expressed her doubts about the official 9/11 report. Before, Michael Meacher, secretary of state in Britain and Andreas Von Bulow, ex Minister from Germany, stated clearly that 9/11 and the war on terror are orchestrated by the Bush administration. Prof. David Ray Griffin held on September 14th, 2006 a lecture ('Should the truth be revealed or concealed') in Copenhagen. In this lecture he asked for a European investigation to the facts of September 11, 2001. To make this demand stronger, the United for truth organization in Belgium is organizing a European protest rally through Brussels. […] They [protesters] agree the 9/11 attacks and other terrorist acts, no matter if they were carried out by some so-called Afghan cavemen or by the governments themselves, inflicted the current policy of fear.

It is hard to believe that in Europe Muslims and far-left radicals are allowed to march in support of their causes and inane theories while those concerned about the ongoing disintegration of their societies are not only being silenced but threatened with legal action.

The controversy surrounding the planned 9/11 rally in Brussels is emblematic of Europe’s rapid descent into madness. Today Europe is a place where things are turned upside down and where common sense is not only commonly disregarded but actively suppressed.

Having lost both its sense of identity and sanity, Europe stands on the brink of being overtaken by Muslims who may well be able to claim their prize without so much as a fight. Brussels’ socialist Mayor Freddy Thielemans is only one of many among Europe’s leftist elites who are not only willing to capitulate to the barbarian invaders of our age but are actively facilitating their progress. America better take heed, for these are the very people its own liberals admire and in whose steps they would like to follow.

The truth behind Marks and Spencers move from Dewsbury

As anyone who lives locally will be aware Marks and Spencer are to close their Dewsbury store after 100 years of trading. Here we print in full an excellent piece submitted by a regular contributor to this blog that analyses the reasons behind Marks and Spencer's 'relocation' and the deterioration of a once proud town. Thanks to JP.

A phoney war of words has erupted between two establishment politicians, Dewsbury's Labour MP Shahid Malik and Kirklees Conservative Council Leader Robert Light (pictured)

Prompted by the news that after 100 years Marks and Spencer is to close its Dewsbury store, MP Malik has implied that the fault lies with Kirklees Council for its failure to invest in the town. Eager to shore up his rapidly diminishing support, Malik has jumped on the 'Dewsbury is going to the dogs' bandwagon that blames Kirklees for favouring Huddersfield over Dewsbury.

Leader Light has reacted with feigned outrage: "What has he (i.e. Malik) ever done for the town?" he shrieked. Light went on to say that the Council had secured over £80 million investment for Dewsbury and he urged everyone to "...talk up Dewsbury" rather than criticise it.

In typical politician's self-congratulatory style, Light shamelessly blows his own trumpet, "We are supporting investments in a children's centre, playground improvements, road and traffic programmes - all aimed at rejuvenating, regenerating, and transforming the fortunes of Dewsbury."

Oh really? And where is this children's centre to be situated, and which children will benefit from it? And which schools will benefit from improved playground facilities, and which roads will benefit from the new traffic programmes? Of course Light doesn't specify - but then he wouldn't, would he?

Let's cut to the quick. Dewsbury is a dump - and its most fitting monument is the clock tower on the Pioneer building where trees take root in the mortar and where the weather vane sits at an appropriately drunken angle.

What's that Councillor Light, we should be talking Dewsbury up? Isn't that like expecting passengers on a sinking ship to say what a wonderful sea voyage they're having?

Light boasts, "The council's continued investment in Dewsbury market resulted in it being judged the best in the UK this year." Out of curiosity, does anyone know who was doing the judging? It certainly wasn't the woman who wrote to the Press recently (17/08/07): "Dewsbury was such a lovely town; now we have a market resembling Bangladesh, women in burkhas and men in pyjamas."

Yes, Dewsbury was a lovely town - past tense. But it's not lovely now, certainly not for its original inhabitants who are in the process of being ethnically cleansed: Dewsbury is being Asianised with the connivance of the likes of Malik and Light. How long before the Minster is converted into a mosque? How long before the mill lass iron sculpture under the railway arches is dressed in a burkha? Surely it's only a matter of time.

Malik blames Kirklees Council for its indifference; Light blames those who aren't talking Dewsbury up.

Both are more concerned with their seats on the gravy train than they are with the truth of what is happening to Dewsbury.

Light is a selfish coward who has no qualms about betraying his fellow ethnic Britons to further his pathetic political 'career'. A better man wouldn't shy away from the real problems of Dewsbury and pretend it can all be made better by 'investment'. But Light isn't a better man, he's afraid of the truth and he hates the BNP because we stand by the truth.

And as you'd expect, Malik has his own agenda.

But no matter how much the politicians wriggle and squirm, there's no getting away from it - Britain's plight is a direct result of the insane immigration policies that Labour and Conservative governments have been employing these past fifty years or so. And they can invest in Dewsbury all they like but they won't put a halt to its deterioration. Labour wants immigrants as voters and the Tories want them as cheap labour. It's called treachery, and when the BNP eventually takes power as it inevitably will, these traitors in parliament and in the council chambers will be introduced to the business end of the rope - after a fair trial of course.

Story here

New Pat Condell video

Here's Pat Condells latest video diary. As usual he hits the nail on the head regarding the ' religion of peace'. Enjoy.

More concessions

In a further example of the continuing Dhimmification of Britain another example from north of the border in Scotland.
Following the attempted Glasgow airport bombings hospital staff in the Lothians region of Scotland have been advised not to have working lunches during Ramadan - which is a 30 day fast- to avoid offending Muslims.
Managers have also been advised that Muslim staff are also to be allowed breaks to pray and time off to celebrate eid.
Why is it whenever Muslim terrorists blow us up or attempt to blow us up it leads to more concessions for their backward beliefs? Shouldn't it be the other way round?
Rather than encouraging them we should be looking at ways of discouraging the Muslim faith with a view to eventually banning it altogether.
Read the story here

More 'Asian' grooming of white girls

Another report here (this time in the Times newspaper) looking at the problem of the racist paedophile grooming of white girls by 'Asian' males. Although the word Asian is a bit of a misnomer bearing in mind the people that are doing the grooming are defined by their religion not their nationality and are overwhelming Muslim and not Hindu or Japanese or Buddhists or Nepalese.
Suppose they're only following in the footsteps of the founder of their religion - the paedophile Mohammed.
The report highlights something the BNP have warned about for years although as usual when we raised the matter we were called racist, liars etc.
It looks at what the BNP have been saying for years - that the grooming of white girls by Muslims is a huge problem and one that is ignored by the liberal establishment and the police for fear of being labelled racist. And is nothing less than the sacrifice of our children in the name of political correctness.
Even Ann Cryer who relies on the Muslim vote to get elected has spoken out and said; "I think there is a problem with the view Asian men generally have about white women. Their view about white women is generally fairly low. They do not seem to understand that there are white girls as moral and as good as Asian girls."
Read the report here.

Why are we so scared of offending Muslims?

A good piece here written by Christopher Hitchens, the lefty half of the Hitchens brothers.
He asks the question in the title and gives the answer which as we all know is; 'because they react with violence to anyone who dares question their beliefs'.
When even deluded lefties like Christopher Hitchens are finally facing reality and slagging off the Islamic religion you know there's a problem.
Read the piece here.

Another racist attack

With monotonous regularity the local papers, once again this week reports, on a Asian on White racist attack in the local area. This time the attack took place on Transvaal terrace in Batley in the early hours of Tuesday when the man in his early 20's was walking home whilst talking on his mobile.
Four Asian men pulled up in a Vauxhall Corsa punched the man to the ground and stabbed him before fleeing in the car.

There hardly seems to be a week goes by when the local papers aren't reporting on a Asian on White racist attack in this area. In fact for at least the last five weeks the local paper -the Press- newspaper has reported on separate attacks on white people and it's been a similar tale for years.
All the attacks seem to take the format, where a lone white person is usually ambushed by a gang of them either in a car or on foot.
But where are the police on this? Predictably silent as always. Although if the attacks were the other way round you could guarantee the Police would be stepping up their patrols and bending over backwards to 'reassure' 'the Community'.
Read the report here

Jihad Will Destroy Us If We Don't Act Now

Robert Spencer

"Fascism lasted 25 years, Communism for 75; Islam is 1,400 years old, the imperative to make war against unbelievers is 1,400 years old and they believe they are fighting a 1,400-year-old struggle. And jihad will destroy us if we don't do anything about it."

An interview here with Robert Spencer America's leading Catholic scholar of Islam that first appeared in the Catholic Herald.
He paints a fascinating yet disturbing insight into the reality of Islam and warns that Europe faces eventual civil war unless we act now.
Spencer subscribes to the growing view -- expressed in books such as While Europe Slept, Eurabia and Mark Steyn's America Alone -- that the contrasting birth rates between Muslim immigrants and secular Europeans will lead to catastrophe.

He also points out that his greatest critics come from that element of the Left supportive of Islam against "the West", a marriage seen by renegade liberals and socialists as the most ill-conceived alliance since a distinctly non-Aryan Japan sided with Nazi Germany.
To Spencer it makes perfect sense. "There is a deep ideological affinity between the Left and the jihadists. Whenever the hard Left gained power they instituted a reign of terror in order to create what they envisage as a just society, brought about by force. Islamic law works in much the same way: utopia created by force."
Sound familiar?
Read the article here.

Muslim heads buried firmly in the sand.

Another good piece in the Times by Hassan Butt the ex jihadi network member.

In this article he tells of the Muslim community's tendency to go into denial when faced with the uncomfortable truths about their religion, a denial also bought into by the establishment in general.
An establishment who would have us beleive the usual nonsense and platitudes such as Islam is 'a religion of peace.' Yeah right.
And an assertion rather contradicted by Hassan Butt where he states:
'Only when Muslims admit that 9/11 and 7/7 were the work of Muslim terrorists can we move forward to the next juncture: which is recognising the hard truth that Islam does permit the use of violence. Muslims who deny this, preferring instead to mouth easy platitudes about how Islam is nothing but a religion of peace, make the job easier for the radicals who can point to passages in the Koran, set down in black and white, that instruct on the killing of unbelievers.'

Well worth reading here.

Raids in Dewsbury

Police this week raided another 2 houses in Dewsbury linked to the 'war on terror'.
The two houses in the Thornhill Lees area of the town were linked to an alleged plot to break Muslim terrorists out of Woodhill prison in Buckinghamshire.
Whats remarkable about this story is not the fact that police are raiding Muslim homes in Dewsbury, in fact there's hardly a week goes by when they don't do just that. But the fact that the police had contacted people in the 'community' - likely to be local Mullahs- to discuss the raids prior to them happening and the fact that these people had accompanied the 'Neighbourhood Policing Team Officers' (or Police as they're known when its none Muslim homes they're raiding) on the raids.
And it's not the first time. And it's happening all over the country.
Since when have white people been afforded the same luxury? The answer as we all know is never.
They're so terrified of upsetting the 'community' they basically do anything the Muslims ask of them.
No-one will be surprised to learn that no arrests were made in the 'raids'. And no wonder when the police are letting them know what they're doing in advance. It's just a joke.
The mind boggles - no wonder they think they're above the law, most of them are!
Read the story here

Muslims United?

Some of you may have noticed the adverts being placed in National newspapers from a group called Muslims United.

The ads condemn the recent attempted terrorist attacks in both London and Glasgow and at the same time praise both the emergency services and – strangely – the Government for their ‘calm and proportionate’ response to the attacks.

On first impressions it would seem like an act of contrition and an attempt by the Muslim community to condemn the terrorists among them but on closer inspection it raises quite a few worrying questions.
Such as:
Just who are Muslims United? I’ve been on their site (weirdly called Islam is Peace) and they claim to be volunteers who share a vision of a diverse, all inclusive and strong Britain (which is all very quaint) but they don’t actually mention any names.
Who is their leader? Again no mention of anyone.
Are any prominent Muslims members? Muslims such as Iqbal Sacranie or Lord Ahmed (to name but a couple).
Where did they get the money to place full page ads in the national newspapers? It must have run into hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Why are they praising the Government rather the general public?
Is this an attempt to glean votes from the Muslim community by giving the Labour party a false endorsement?
And is this just another organisation in the same mould as the Muslim Council of Britain set up by Labour, funded by the taxpayer and designed to mislead the public?

The ad goes onto quote the often quoted piece from the Koran whenever there is some terrorist attack or other in the name of Islam (Surah al-Maidah 5 verse 32) that:
‘Whoever kills an innocent soul, it is as if he killed the whole of mankind. And whoever saves one, it is as if he saved the whole of mankind’.
Once again the passage is misquoted the actual verse reads as such:
“We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our messengers with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land"

They claim that Islam’s stance on terrorism is unambiguous but then why are they having to edit verses of the Koran to change the original meaning? If the authors have to slice and dice a verse to make it say what they want, then I think their claim to be the "clear about Islam's stance on such acts" is decidedly suspect. The actual verse says 'if anyone slew a person-unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land'...
The land means Muslim land and murder and spreading mischief is precisely what we (the west) are repeatedly accused of doing in Iraq and Afghanistan therefore - in the eyes of Islam - we are legitimate targets .
Wake up Britain, vote BNP

What excuses now for the Doctors of Death?

The liberal-left apologists for Islamic violence have had their flawed arguments well and truly shattered in the wake of the failed trio of attempts to bring death and carnage to the streets of Britain. Every single daily national newspaper is today carrying headlines which the BNP have been using for years, every paper headline will give the BNP another batch of votes and another batch of membership enquiries.

Claims by liberals that poverty, discrimination and “exclusion” fuels young Muslims living in Britain and around the Islamic world to extremist clerics who radicalize them to become terrorists and suicide bombers, have any shred of credibility they may have had totally destroyed as the backgrounds of the individuals behind the thwarted Glasgow Airport attack are revealed.

Security sources believe 12 individuals were involved in the attempt to detonate gas cylinders in the main hall of Glasgow Airport on Saturday (30th June) afternoon.

Eight people have so far been arrested in the hunt for the car bombers who tried to cause carnage in London and Glasgow. Six of them are NHS doctors.

The eight arrested are:

• Dr. Mohammed Asha, 26 year old from Staffordshire, arrested by police in swoop at Sandbach on the M6.

• Marwah Asha, 27 year old wife of above. Lab technician at Shrewsbury Hospital.

• Dr. Bilal Abdullah, originally from Iraq, worked at Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley. He was the driver of the Jeep which ploughed into the main airport hall on Saturday.

• The other unnamed man in the Jeep, in intensive care in Paisley with life-threatening burns.

• An unnamed 26 year old Indian doctor working at Halton Hospital in Cheshire.

• A unnamed Saudi junior doctor, aged 25 who worked at the Royal Alexandra.

• A unnamed Saudi junior doctor, aged 28 who worked at the Royal Alexandra.

• Mohammed Haneef, 27 year old medical registrar, arrested in Queensland, Australia.

Deliverers of death

There is little evidence of poverty, social exclusion or disadvantage amongst those who plan to kill, maim and destroy, quite the opposite; the alleged terror bombers and their accomplices are well educated, privileged and were viewed as respectable pillars of the community. It might appear ironic that the men and women who worked to give their lives to saving others should be the architects and practitioners of death, but the very foundation of the faith practiced by those arrested, those on the run and those who are today working on the terror plots of tomorrow is one of violence, deceit and warfare.

“Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know.” (Qu’an 8:60).

There may be passages in the Christian Bible particularly in the Old Testament which make blood curdling reading (Numbers 31:17-18) for example but the enemies are specific and unambiguous – in this case the tribe of Midianites. The Qu’an (Koran) seems to command the war against all unbelievers is open-ended and universal.

Further most Britons who tick the box “Christian” on census returns or other forms of identification have probably never read, or had read to them the entire contents of the Bible, let alone pay its content any regard in the running of their daily lives. Muslims on the other hand have the contents of their holy book rammed home not just weekly like many Church-going Christians but five times a day.

Islam is at odds with everything we in the west stand for. It is diametrically opposed to our enlightened forms of social governance, democracy, free thinking, scientific enquiry and common justice. The BNP remains the only political party which stands firm, speaks the truth and says that there is no place for Islam in Britain.

Reproduced in full from the BNP website.

Global Jihad continues.

As anyone from the BNP and anyone who's ever bothered to look into the subject will tell you, the latest terror attacks and the recent preceding one's are not merely a reaction to western foreign policy by disaffected Muslim youths but an extension to a 1400 year global jihad that the followers of Islam have been waging against the West.

If it wasn't the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan then the more 'radical' followers of this religion would find some other way of justifying their actions by terrorism.
Whereas all the other major religions believe in co-existing in peace with other religions, Islam is unique in that it actively seeks to subjugate the followers of other religions and non-believers, to the teachings of Islam.
By force if necessary.
It's all in the Koran, part of being a 'good' Muslim and is one of the obligations of all followers

An article in today's Daily Mail by a former member of the 'Jihad network' speaks of the delusion that most of the British establishment seeks to perpetuate IE. that Islam is a religion like all others and it's not the religion that it's flawed just some of it's followers.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
As this chap points out Muslims are taught to see the world in terms of Muslim and Infidel. Believer and non-believer and non-believers should be converted or eliminated at all costs. Integration never comes into it.
Wake up Britain.
Read the story here.
Read more of the Global Jihad here and here.

Muslim video

Shocking video about the worshippers of the religion of peace. I was sickened ;0)
It takes a few seconds to load but well worth the wait!
Here