Showing posts with label muslim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label muslim. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 September 2007

Markazi mosque

Interesting Editors comment in this weeks Press newspaper which refers to Monday's story in the Times newspaper which investigated a Muslim group that has its headquarters at the Markazi mosque in Savile Town in Dewsbury.
The group's ultimate aim- according to a 'shocked' Times reporter - is to convert the country and ultimately the world to Islam - not exactly a revelation bearing in mind that spreading the word of Islam , by force if necessary is what required of all 'good' Muslims and is sanctioned by Allah in black and white in their Holy book - The Koran.
No wonder Shahid Malik is so keen to try to shut the Press newspaper down which leads us to our next story regarding the front page lead which refers to Malik's decision to sue the Press newspaper because they printed a letter from Jonathan Scott the then prospective Conservative candidate for Dewsbury South who claimed in the letter to have been racially threatened by Malik's entourage outside a polling station.
Despite the letter appearing in the Labour supporting, arse licking Dewsbury Reporter as well as the Press Newspaper strangely enough only the Press are being sued in court.
Unfortunately for Malik even if he does manage to win this court case - which would be no surprise bearing in mind the political sympathies of most Judges - it can do him nothing but harm and will show his true colours and petty mindedness to those who voted for him the first time around.
Read the Editors comment here. (Scroll Down)
Read the story about Malik here

Monday, 27 August 2007

November Bank Holiday?

Apparently Labour 'insiders' are considering another Bank holiday intended for November on the Monday after Remembrance Sunday to honour community 'heroes'.
Kath Stanley of the 'Public Policy Research' a Marxist think tank which advises the Government says:
'We need a day when people give something back to their communities and celebrate the diversity and pluralism of modern Britain'.
In other words a day off to allow them to ram 'multi culturalism' and 'diversity' and other unwelcome additions and dilutions of our once great nation down our throats.
You can imagine the BBC TV programming schedule for the day.
It'd be all about what terrible, nasty people whites are and would be dominated by programs about slavery, how black crime and failure is white people's fault, Steven Lawrence, how we're all wrong about Islam and how it's such a cuddly, touchy feely type religion that would be favoured by kittens. Then they'd wheel on the obligatory white apologist such as Ken Livingstone, blubbing for white people's sins and begging some black such as Jessie Jackson (who used to spit in white people hamburgers when he worked in a fast food take away) for forgiveness.
You get the picture, the BBC execs would be orgasmic at the very thought of it.

Well no thank you, you can stick your bank holiday where the sun doesn't shine (and it never does especially in November). We and millions of other fellow Brits don't need a bank holiday to remind us what it means to be British, we live and breath it every day. It's New Labour traitors who appear to have forgot or rather are trying to forget what it means to be British by doing their utmost to turn our once great nation into a third world slum, such is their contempt for us and all things British.
And why put it on the day after Remembrance Sunday? Is it some attempt to overshadow the sacrifices given by British soldiers around the globe?
What do you think?
Obviously remembering the nations war dead who died so that the likes of New Labour would have the freedoms they so abuse today, is far too hideously white for their sensibilities so they attempt to sweep it under the carpet with the rest of Britain's history that they seem to be so ashamed of.
Another Bank Holiday would be nice but not to celebrate something that the British people never asked for and never wanted. No way.
Read the story here.

Saturday, 25 August 2007

Anti-Islamist Rally Banned in Brussels



By Vasko Kohlmayer
FrontPageMagazine.com
An eagerly awaited public rally was to take place in Brussels – the capital of the European Union – on September 11 of this year. Called ‘Against Islamisation of Europe,’ its intent was to protest the spreading of Islamic sharia law across the European continent and honour by a minute of silence the victims of the 9/11 terror attacks.

The event was being organized by SIOE (Stop the Islamisation of Europe), an alliance of people from across Europe whose objective is to prevent Islam from ‘becoming a dominant political force in Europe.’ Concerned about the Muslim subversion of the continent’s cultures and institutions, SIOE’s has this to say about Islam:

No other religion demands more from those who do not adhere to its doctrine. This would not be a problem if our leaders actually stood up for Western values and insisted that Muslims live within our laws and accepted our cultures and social systems. Instead, it is we who are told we must abandon our values, cultures and societies in order not to offend Muslims. It is Islam that is being rammed down our throats and the throats of our children. It is not only in the West that Islam is causing misery and mayhem. All around the world Islam is battling the “infidels”.

In a clear sign of public support for the planned demonstration, 20,000 people from across Europe have pledged their participation.

But now it looks the event will not be allowed to proceed. On August 13, Brussels’ Mayor Freddy Thielemans, a socialist, made the decision not to issue a permit for the march.

The Mayor’s decision is a very unusual one, because Brussels is known as a demonstration friendly city. In fact, it is the demonstration capital of the world with two or three events taking place on average every day. In the last six years alone, the Mayor’s office has received 3,600 requests for public protest permits of which only 6 have been denied.

But the Mayor is trying to do more than just stop people from voicing their concerns about the ongoing Islamization of their culture. This is what he wrote on August 20 in an op-ed piece in the Belgian newspaper De Standaard:

First and foremost the organizers have chosen the symbolic date of 9/11. The intention is obviously to confound the terrorist activities of Muslim extremists on the one hand and Islam as a religion and all Muslims on the other hand. […] Such incitement to discrimination and hatred, which we usually call racism and xenophobia, is forbidden by a considerable number of international treaties and is punished by our penal laws and by European legislation. The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly pronounced judgments condemning this type of acts.

In what is a truly surreal development, a European public official calls those concerned about the encroachment of Islam on their life extremists and threatens criminal prosecution if they don’t desist.

The Mayor’s concern about extremism is very selective, however. In December of 2004, for example, he allowed a demonstration to proceed where more than 20,000 Iranians protested against the inclusion of People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran in EU's list of terrorist organizations. This is how this group was once described by the US Department of State:

The Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), a leftist revolutionary group, was formed in 1963. Its founding principles included the creation of a Marxist-oriented Islamic government in Iran; opposition to 'imperialism' as supposedly embodied by the United States; opposition to Zionism and Israel; and a close affinity to Third World radical movements. […] To achieve its political objectives, the MEK almost from its inception has engaged in acts of terrorism and violence; the organization was responsible for fatal attacks on several Americans in Iran in the 1970s.

Not only was the demonstration allowed to go on – it took place in front of the EU’s headquarters – it received extensive official backing. Numerous speeches were made by European parliamentarians and various public personalities seeking to remove the group’s terror designation.

This makes for a remarkable situation: In the EU capital, Iranian Muslims are allowed to show their solidarity with a questionable organization while native citizens are being turned into criminals for seeking to voice their concerns about the unfolding Islamic takeover of their lands.

To add insult to injury, on the very day the organizers of the 9/11 rally were protesting the decision to block the event, Mayor Thielemans approved a permit for another demonstration to take place on September 9. Organized by an alliance of ‘various truth, peace and human right movements in Europe’ calling themselves United for Truth, they claim that the 9/11 attacks were staged by the Bush administration with possible support from some European governments. A message posted on their website on July 30 reads in part:

Recently the French Minister for Housing and the City Mme Christine Boutin expressed her doubts about the official 9/11 report. Before, Michael Meacher, secretary of state in Britain and Andreas Von Bulow, ex Minister from Germany, stated clearly that 9/11 and the war on terror are orchestrated by the Bush administration. Prof. David Ray Griffin held on September 14th, 2006 a lecture ('Should the truth be revealed or concealed') in Copenhagen. In this lecture he asked for a European investigation to the facts of September 11, 2001. To make this demand stronger, the United for truth organization in Belgium is organizing a European protest rally through Brussels. […] They [protesters] agree the 9/11 attacks and other terrorist acts, no matter if they were carried out by some so-called Afghan cavemen or by the governments themselves, inflicted the current policy of fear.

It is hard to believe that in Europe Muslims and far-left radicals are allowed to march in support of their causes and inane theories while those concerned about the ongoing disintegration of their societies are not only being silenced but threatened with legal action.

The controversy surrounding the planned 9/11 rally in Brussels is emblematic of Europe’s rapid descent into madness. Today Europe is a place where things are turned upside down and where common sense is not only commonly disregarded but actively suppressed.

Having lost both its sense of identity and sanity, Europe stands on the brink of being overtaken by Muslims who may well be able to claim their prize without so much as a fight. Brussels’ socialist Mayor Freddy Thielemans is only one of many among Europe’s leftist elites who are not only willing to capitulate to the barbarian invaders of our age but are actively facilitating their progress. America better take heed, for these are the very people its own liberals admire and in whose steps they would like to follow.

Tuesday, 21 August 2007

New Pat Condell video

Here's Pat Condells latest video diary. As usual he hits the nail on the head regarding the ' religion of peace'. Enjoy.


Saturday, 11 August 2007

More 'Asian' grooming of white girls

Another report here (this time in the Times newspaper) looking at the problem of the racist paedophile grooming of white girls by 'Asian' males. Although the word Asian is a bit of a misnomer bearing in mind the people that are doing the grooming are defined by their religion not their nationality and are overwhelming Muslim and not Hindu or Japanese or Buddhists or Nepalese.
Suppose they're only following in the footsteps of the founder of their religion - the paedophile Mohammed.
The report highlights something the BNP have warned about for years although as usual when we raised the matter we were called racist, liars etc.
It looks at what the BNP have been saying for years - that the grooming of white girls by Muslims is a huge problem and one that is ignored by the liberal establishment and the police for fear of being labelled racist. And is nothing less than the sacrifice of our children in the name of political correctness.
Even Ann Cryer who relies on the Muslim vote to get elected has spoken out and said; "I think there is a problem with the view Asian men generally have about white women. Their view about white women is generally fairly low. They do not seem to understand that there are white girls as moral and as good as Asian girls."
Read the report here.

Tuesday, 7 August 2007

Why are we so scared of offending Muslims?

A good piece here written by Christopher Hitchens, the lefty half of the Hitchens brothers.
He asks the question in the title and gives the answer which as we all know is; 'because they react with violence to anyone who dares question their beliefs'.
When even deluded lefties like Christopher Hitchens are finally facing reality and slagging off the Islamic religion you know there's a problem.
Read the piece here.

Saturday, 4 August 2007

Another racist attack

With monotonous regularity the local papers, once again this week reports, on a Asian on White racist attack in the local area. This time the attack took place on Transvaal terrace in Batley in the early hours of Tuesday when the man in his early 20's was walking home whilst talking on his mobile.
Four Asian men pulled up in a Vauxhall Corsa punched the man to the ground and stabbed him before fleeing in the car.

There hardly seems to be a week goes by when the local papers aren't reporting on a Asian on White racist attack in this area. In fact for at least the last five weeks the local paper -the Press- newspaper has reported on separate attacks on white people and it's been a similar tale for years.
All the attacks seem to take the format, where a lone white person is usually ambushed by a gang of them either in a car or on foot.
But where are the police on this? Predictably silent as always. Although if the attacks were the other way round you could guarantee the Police would be stepping up their patrols and bending over backwards to 'reassure' 'the Community'.
Read the report here