A piece in the Daily Express here by Leo McKinstry tells of how the indigenous population of these islands and especially the English are discriminated against by the state whilst at the same time paying for the privilege. It's a ridiculous state of affairs where non-whites are seen by the state as unable to make it on their own two feet and therefore need a leg up.
Like I've said many times in this blog the race industry is not based on wanting equality it wants preferential treatment for non-whites based on nothing more than the distorted Marxist view of looking at things. In their muddled thinking 2 plus 2 doesn't equal 4 it equals racism.
Fortunately more and more people are waking up to the fact and voting for the only party that will make a change.
Vote BNP!
Read the story here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
"The instances of aggressive Muslim behavior which are recounted in different ways throughout the world depend more on the numbers of Muslims in proportion to the numbers of other members of true religions. The mindset of Muslims is to force that cult onto others. Their only restraint in doing so is when the numbers of those resistant exceed the numbers of Muslims.
In the West, Muslim insistence is magnified by dhimmified government bureaucracies and secular minded liberalised idealists who attempt to apply multicultural relativism. They only strengthen those pushing Islam and punish native populations who want to maintain relative equality without foreign customs and practices being forced upon them.
Why are people of the West willing to accept that relative equality with such a cult should be desirable? Even if those on the left (including neo-con globalists) who assist Islamic inroads into free Western societies were to allow Islam on an equal basis, and would do so without allowing special favors to Islamics, why should we find that acceptable?
Some may accept Islamic demands for a time. Muslim mindsets, regardless of whether it is allowed or disallowed by Western governments, will force Islam against those within our societies.
We need to examine our willingness to accept equality in our lands. Would our ancestors have accepted such invasion? The only difference between those ancestors and us is that they had a healthy self-interest wherein such an imposition would not have been allowed by invading immigrants or by anyone else.
They certainly would not have tolerated a government, or any representatives within it, who did not represent their interests.
They would not have accepted a subterfuge that said that those recently immigrated masses have been granted legal recognition and are therefore as good as or better than you.
They would not have accepted a stranglehold by the left on our governments and they would not have allowed intolerant, aggressive ideologies to establish within our societies.
Attitudes have changed since then, but we had better examine why those attitudes have changed. They will change again. Necessity will see to that.
What has been foisted upon us, by stealth applied over time ,will be more difficult to dislodge when the left has stronger allies with increased numbers of immigrants and Islamics. They already make clear who they choose to represent. It is not the British or American people. It is not Europeans."
from http://myflandersfields.blogspot.com/2007/08/hamas-regime-is-pressing-christians-to.html
Naj great post and cheers for popping over to my site, good posts Kirklees sorry I dont always comment as I am usually busy, but I always pop in past.
Keep up the good fight Aberdeen BNP
Brill posts Hi Naj,Kirklees keep up the good work the pair of you.
Post a Comment